SPN 11×20: Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit analyzing TV

Random thoughts on Supernatural 11×20 “Don’t Call Me Shurley” in no particular order, except for the fact that the most important bit is last.

Re: Is Chuck God’s meatsuit? I initially thought that the lines could be read either way, but on rewatch Metatron DOES say “masquerading in that meatsuit”, which is a pretty good case for “Chuck (pre-existing human) as vessel”. As I told Jules I still think it’s weird that God needs an Uber, but I guess he’s really method. Certainly feeds other questions like:
– how did that conversation go down? (I’m calling the fic “Are You There, Chuck? It’s Me, God”)
– did Chuck get a one-way to Heaven, or is it a rideshare? I guess chilling with God is probably as good as it gets…?
– it seems like a human couldn’t contain God if most can’t contain archangels, but this also feeds into the question of why Lucifer is happy as a hermit crab in Cas. Maybe God rebuilding stuff on a molecular level makes it “better, faster, stronger” as the song goes; this might work for God as well. It’s not Jimmy but a rebuilt vessel for Cas in Jimmy’s image, so what God has is less a meatsuit and more a Chuck-a-like. OR, God simply isn’t bound by the same rules as his creations, which is equally defensible (especially since those rules were in service of his story arcs).
– not a question, but apparently Chuck’s persona – whether God’s faking or it’s, uh, “character bleed” was good for God.

Re: where was the Samulet: honestly, I don’t really care. Hahah. Sam can’t have had it in his pocket all this time; he gets thrown around the room way too much for that to work out. Admittedly, he didn’t seem that surprised it was in his pocket, but I mean, it was a surprising kinda day. The joke is the not knowing, so I’m okay to leave it be. 😉 Have fun with theories, I just don’t think it’s significant.

Why the eff doesn’t this show get Emmy nominations: I could write a whole lot about this, but I think everyone saw how much the build up of skill in every area of the show combined with a fantastic script in the hands of a stellar guest cast worked out. But I hope everyone appreciates what kind of acting caliber it takes to walk on to a show after years and be like “what’s up, I’m the same character but btw I’m God”. And this is no patch on the kind of writing and directing talent it takes, as well, to make an episode which was largely just a conversation between 2 men in a static set intensely charged. And you’re talking about really complicated emotional journeys there, too. It’d be hard enough if it was black box theater, but to do it for TV with more than one take, and at least partially out of order? Both Rob and Curtis made me very emotional both times, and they didn’t even touch the dog. Damn, guys. With as many syllables as possible. daaaaaaaayuuummmmm. (I didn’t really give credit to the dog. The dog was good, too.)

Re if there’s a favorites competition: Castiel is winning over Lucifer. He’s certainly done him a lot more favors. Lucifer didn’t get ANY second chances. (…yet?)

Re: end of the season: I actually try to be really careful about specific predictions. I have some, but I work really hard not to get obsessed with what I’d do and not let the show do what IT is doing. I’ve messed this up in the past with SPN and it wasn’t fair to the show or myself. That said…
If any show in history was to kill off God, it’d be Supernatural. I think it will, and I think the reasoning leads to my most important analysis of this episode…

– God’s not just hiding because he’s given up on his creation. He’s scared. He’s in a safe house. And he refers to “worlds”, and calls the destruction on TV “reruns”. This isn’t the first sandcastle Amara’s knocked down. With the help of the archangels (Metatron mentions Lucifer first, but also uses the plural), God “barely” locks Amara away. Several archangels are now either dead or out of commission. This is not going to be an easy fight.

– So he’s sitting there writing his autobiography, and the one creation he chooses to be at his side is his scribe. His editor. The same person he called on before he left previously. “Who lives, who dies, who tells your story?”

– God’s song choice. “One of these days / won’t be long / you’ll call my name / and I’ll be gone”. God thinks he’s going to die, or at least he will be gone in a true sense. Finally. Maybe because Amara is his opposite – his mirror – the only way light can drive out darkness is if they’re both destroyed. She definitely is aiming to kill him. I’m definitely sure that mirror analogy is important. This show has been about symmetry from the start.

Metatron succeeds – in his redemption and in convincing Chuck – when he decides to be a fan. A fan of the creation. And to be an editor, not try to reinvent what the creator did. Ain’t that the metaphor for the age of reboots, retreads, and remakes. Especially on a show with its own absent creator, carrying on the story after his tablets had finished. And Metatron tells God HE has to service his creation, too. He has to let it be more than he is. You can’t service the art unless you want it to be better than you, and it IS better than your ego. And once it’s out in the world, it is going to trip up and disappoint you and give you the finger and be shaped by hands other than yours. And that, somehow, is how the goal of the act of creation isn’t just to miraculously make something better than what you put in, but that it makes you better once it leaves your hands. Or that’s why you keep trying, anyway; why you keep building sandcastles, even if they get kicked down. You build them until you create something that can live without you.

VanCon 2015 and carrying your words like a torch

At one of my colleges (long story), a professor told me that I didn’t say much but that when I did speak, people listened. I once forgot to do the reading and faked my way through a roundtable discussion on medieval Japanese court poetry, so I hope he was talking about another time. But I’ve always hoped he was right, in spite of assuming 99% of what I say is nonsense and no one is paying attention.

Most people already know that aside from having a fabulous VanCon, I went Supernatural set stalking on Monday. Because apparently we couldn’t think of anything better to do in the pouring rain than take a taxi to the far suburbs and walk for half an hour on residential roads with no clue where we were going. To our credit, we laughed the entire way. We stayed for several hours after everyone else left and there was little to see – but just before wrap, Jared waved us across the street onto the set and showed us around the Impala. He had us sit in the actual Impala. And Jensen heard him rev the engine and came out to check on his “Baby”, and I briefly thought Dean Winchester had manifested into reality to kick my ass. Look, I left “speechless” weeks ago. You all know, details or not, that we were incredibly fortunate and fans could not dare to dream of anything better. Last VanCon was my first Supernatural convention; I knew no one. To have come to that place in a year was, and continues to be, simply staggering.

But I’m not sure that was the most unbelievable thing that happened while I was in Vancouver.

Continue reading


“May it be a light for you in dark places, when all other lights go out.”

It’s very difficult to describe to those who have never been in a fandom why under its lens enthusiasm becomes passion, and acquaintances can become family. “It’s just a TV show!” they’ll exclaim. Precisely why media fandom is a more popular target for this criticism than, for example, sports fans, is a question unto itself. The fact remains that for people who have never been – even casually – participants in a fandom for a TV show, film, book, a blog, have great difficulty grasping how it’s possible that it could become the tentpole of a relatively sane individual’s life.

I’ve thought a lot about how to explain the kind of deep emotional ties that we can create with fiction (and often, creators of said fiction), and I think I’ve finally got it.

Imagine a lighthouse. Continue reading

Sherlock S3 E1: The Empty Hearse

Sherlock is, overall, an unconventional series. They like to drop breadcrumbs early on that are easy to miss, threads that eventually tie into a later plot element and only then make sense. This is part of what makes the show so clever, but that always leaves them on the knife edge of leaving too many viewers too confused, or giving the impression that events occur out of left field. Personally, I think it takes me three passes with anything complex to really get a handle on my opinion, and Sherlock is no exception. One for the heart (gut emotional reactions), one for the brain (evaluating what’s really happening), and one for the mechanism that makes it tick. I have to say that Sherlock Series 3 is the one I’m most conflicted about, and I think it will take another full pass through the season to really line up my thoughts and draw a conclusion.

I was initially in agreement with the fandom consensus that the case in the episode was too light, but on viewing #3 I feel less so. There’s some very deliberate structuring to make story elements overlap, so that you simply don’t register that one storyline is concurrent with another. They’re laying down the groundwork for one event while your attention is focused on another (e.g., always read the headlines on papers characters are reading). They’ve got a lot to pack into this episode, too: Sherlock’s return and the consequences of that, the question of “how he did it” lingering from the S2 cliffhanger, the events in John’s life in the intervening period, two cases, AND some subtle but critical setup for following episodes. That is a whole lot of pieces of furniture to move around. On top of that, there’s the “emotional baggage” of the characters AND the viewers that needs shifting after the two-year hiatus.

And it’s a bit of a Herculean task. [SPOILERS – ASSUMES YOU HAVE SEEN THE EPISODE] Continue reading

Sleepy Hollow is the most progressive show you may not be watching

I was watching Sleepy Hollow this past Monday and at the end of a scene was struck by something. There were five characters in this scene, and only one of them was white. (He’s also British and a man out of time, but I don’t think that quite qualifies him as a minority.) This is a pretty remarkable occurrence on primetime network TV.

It was a brief flash of thought that led me to be pretty mystified why I haven’t heard much discussion about how remarkable this show really is. What better day to bring it up than Martin Luther King Jr. Day, which also happens to be their season finale? Does it take people who can suspend their disbelief enough to accept a Revolutionary era soldier (who works for the Masons) was resurrected in modern day by witchcraft so he could fight the Apocalypse to be okay with a black female co-lead? Okay, maybe not; Kerry Washington has been winning awards for Scandal. But there’s no denying that most TV is still staggeringly lacking in diversity of all types.

Continue reading

Cavalcade of Canadians: The Actor-Spotting Trivia Game

Yes, at long last, it’s the rules to the infamous game I’ve been playing forever, but named a few years ago. I’m writing them up because a few friends thought this was an actual thing that I did not invent (in contrast to the ones who just assumed I was nuts). So please, read on. Don’t leave me to play alone. When I’m sewing in the middle of the night no one can hear me call points. Let’s make it an actual thing.


CAVALCADE OF CANADIANS: The Actor-Spotting Trivia Game
Fun for the Whole Family (If your family consists of Canadian casting directors)
Continue reading

Sherlock S3 E2: The Sign of Three

[CONTAINS SPOILERS] This episode has already been a point of contention among the frenzied mass of Sherlock fans who waited two years for a new series. I’m not sure any of us can even process new information fully after so much time disassembling and reassembling every iota of S1 and S2. But I’ll say at the start that I’m taking up the middle ground – I like it, AND it’s a bit incoherent and fragmented. For the sake of argument I’d rather focus on some of the negatives, since I’ve seen more of the positive.

Continue reading